Friday, February 15, 2008

A Victory Over Pretexting: One Down, One to Go


Hewlett Packard has paid a hefty but undisclosed sum to reporters for Business Week and the New York Times, to settle the widely publicized pretexting scandal. Gumshoes for the company had lied to get phone records and other personal information from reporters.

Hewlett Packard had the decency, belated as it was, to admit fault and act to set things straight. Contrast this with Overstock.com, which openly engages in pretexting via its nauseating in-house stalker, Judd Bagley.

Bagley freely admits to lying about his identity and planting spyware in emails, with the goal of intimidating critics and suppressing criticism of the company.

Overstock is under SEC investigation, but it is time for a criminal investigation of Overstock's and Bagley's conduct.



The telegenic lifelong bachelor has boasted on his blog about having "8,000" emails demonstrating his various conspiracy theories -- including "1,841" from me that, as he describes them, would be forged if they are not figments of Byrne's lurid imagination. The SEC needs to subpoena those "emails" in its ongoing probe, and include this sordid company's pretexting and smear campaign in whatever action it eventually takes.

At least one forged email was offered up to a reporter for The Register, an Internet tabloid, who was researching a hatchet job on Wikipedia. The SEC needs to find out who forged those emails (as if we didn't know) and make an appropriate criminal referral.

UPDATE: There's a persistent rumor that Gradient Analytics has filed a countersuit in its long-running legal battle with Overstock. Actually a bit more than a rumor, as the source is the well-informed scambuster, Sam Antar.

Funny that it wasn't disclosed -- even as Overstock belched forth an update on a minor turn of the screw in said litigation. (I would say "SEC take notice," but even the sleepiest SEC investigator would notice this one.) Gee, is it bad when a company discloses only the aspects of ongoing litigation that make it look good?

© 2007 Gary Weiss. All rights reserved.

Digg my article

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, May 25, 2007

Will the Last Overstock.com Director Please Turn Out the Lights?


The Overstock.com train wreck appears to be progressing faster than I had expected, and, as usual, CEO Patrick Byrne's nutty behavior is the catalyst.

Last night, the company announced the resignation of Ray Groves, a member of its board of directors audit committee and one of two "financial experts" on the board. The announcement did not mention the reason, which Groves disclosed in an SEC filing -- "My resignation relates to the Company’s prime broker suit."

Here's Sam Antar's and Herb Greenberg's take on the situation, and a good column by Seth Jayson. The stock tanked in reaction to the news. Herb observes: "Interesting to note that in its official press release, Overstock didn't mention the official reason, instead leaving it to an SEC filing on the day before a three-day weekend." Yeah. You'd think he didn't want people to notice, or something.

The "prime broker suit" is, of course, the moronic junk lawsuit that Byrne filed against half of Wall Street just before announcing fourth-quarter earnings, in a crass attempt to divert attention from the Niagara Falls of red ink.

This is now the third board member to quit because of Byrne's nutty antics.

The first was his father, insurance magnate John Byrne, who was chairman of the company. He quit after an embarrassing falling-out over Byrne's anti-naked-shorting "jihad." As I and others observed at the time, the elder Byrne's departure was a mockery of corporate governance, because a responsible board chairman would have forced a bizarre and delusional CEO's departure, and not just slinked away.

The second board member to leave because of Byrne's craziness was John A. Fisher, who like Groves was a member of the audit committee and who also quit because of the prime broker suit.

More recently, another audit committee member, Allison Abraham, dumped 15,000 shares of the stock. A real vote of confidence, that.

Now, this being Overstock.com, the Groves question raises regulatory questions. Among them: Is that the only reason Groves (and, for that matter, Fisher and the elder Byrne) resigned?

And why is Groves resigning now over a lawsuit filed in early February? Fisher quit in March.

Are there other disagreements that have not been disclosed?

And why wasn't the reason for Groves's resignation disclosed in the press release?

Remember that Hewlett-Packard recently was penalized by the SEC for not providing a full disclosure of the reasons for a board member resigning.

It is interesting, I think, that the two board members who have left -- supposedly solely because they don't like the lawsuit -- were both on the audit committee. This company is under SEC investigation, and one of the subjects of its subpoeanas to the company and Byrne is its accounting practices. Sam Antar has, additionally, raised many serious questions concerning the company's accounting, particularly for inventories, on his blog. I understand that accounting practices are a central focus of the SEC's investigation.


As usual when bad news is about to hit the headlines, Byrne dispatched his in-house cyberstalker, the newly promoted director of communications (and official corporate spokesperson) Judd Bagley, to produce a diversion on the antisocialmedia.net corporate smear site. It appeared on ASM early this morning, and was announced by Gagley (sorry, I wrote that while gagging) on the Investor Village message board shortly after 6 a.m., Eastern time, today.

This one claims mysterious "emails" asserting a closeasthis relationship between myself and the hated Depository Trust and Clearing Corp., the Wall Street back office operation that is a subject of a junk-lawsuit campaign by the naked shorting nutcases.

Bagley also drags in Roddy Boyd of the New York Post, who clearly terrifies Byrne. Boyd was the subject of Bagley's last smear. With the Boyd smear, Overstock.com now has a 100% track record on the media -- it now has published lies about every single reporter who has written negatively about Overstock, via smears from surrogates like Bagley and directly from Byrne.

My favorite part of the ASM post is the last line: ". . . a disturbing picture of that organization’s policy of defamatory, surrogate-driven, scorched earth public relations is beginning to emerge."

Note that the nauseating Bagley precisely describes himself and his own job at Overstock.com, in the context of lies directed at innocent people. The term "surrogate-driven," of course, describes Byrne's own use of surrogates such as Phil Saunders, a/k/a "Bob O'Brien," to smear critics and members of the media.


Byrne's and Bagley's habit of projecting on others their own sleaziness will make for an interesting study in abnormal psychology after this is all over, and Overstock.com is just a foul memory.

Speaking of which, I think a test of the SEC's credibility will be the extent to which it includes this nightcrawler in its future Overstock.com- and Byrne-related enforcement actions. Surely those fabricated "emails," if they exist, should be promptly subpoeanaed by the SEC.

Yes, I realize that Overstock.com's accounting practices are the focus of regulatory scrutiny. But its systematic violations of corporate ethics -- via the employment of at least one full-time cyberstalker and smear peddler -- surely deserve appropriate sanctions.

© 2007 Gary Weiss. All rights reserved.

-----------

Wall Street Versus America was published by Penguin USA on April 6.
Click here for its Amazon.com listing and here for more information on the book, from my web site, gary-weiss.com.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, May 07, 2007

Hewlett Packard's Victims Should Not Be Taken Off the Story

The New York Times reports today that three of the journalists who were victimized by Hewlett Packard unethical snooping have decided to sue the company. I was delighted--hey, journalists are citizens too -- until I read further down, and saw that most of the reporters slimed by this company are no longer on the H-P beat.

Obviously, reporters who are suing a company should not be allowed to cover it. However, it appears that the reporters suing H-P were removed from the beat -- presumably as a direct result of H-P's well-publicized misconduct. That is not a good thing.

When a company engages in misconduct, or commences a libel suit to silence a critical reporter, the proper approach is for that reporter to redouble his or her efforts to get at the truth. In fact, the reporter should stay on the story even he or she was going to be removed for unrelated reasons.

That's exactly what happened to David Halberstam when the Kennedy Administration wanted him taken out of Vietnam. The Times refused, and canceled a vacation so that it might not be seen as buckling under to pressure.

I was about to say that "The spirit of David Halberstam is not living on in the media today," but why state the obvious?

© 2007 Gary Weiss. All rights reserved.

-----------

Wall Street Versus America was published by Penguin USA on April 6.
Click here for its Amazon.com listing and here for more information on the book, from my web site, gary-weiss.com.

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Is the media overreacting on H-P?

Marek Fuchs makes that point in TheStreet.com, and he may be right. He says the media, after first downplaying all that spying stuff, is now piling on: “Hell hath no fury like a business media that was wrong — they’ll ride the story both ways, overreacting as much as they originally underreacted.”

The media frenzy on Hewlett-Packard reminds me a little of how the financial press piled on Dick Grasso during his 2003 pay controversy.

I think that the "piñata principle" applies here. That is, once the criticism of a company or executive reaches a tipping point, he is officially a "piñata" and will remain such until an effective counter-spin campaign commences.

During his pay controversy, Grasso was tranformed from "capitalist icon" into "grasping and overpaid bald man" and roughly the same thing has happened to the H-P dustup, which moved quickly from "big nothing" into a chairperson-displacing earthquake.

I did enjoy the spectre of a CEO apologizing to journalists, by the way. Now that is a man-bites-dog story.

© 2006 Gary Weiss. All rights reserved.

-----------

Wall Street Versus America was published by Penguin USA on April 6.
Click here for its Amazon.com listing and here for more information on the book, from my web site.

Labels: ,

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Wanted: Some Good Spin

I almost feel sorry for whomever is in charge of "crisis management" at Hewlett-Packard. Today's Washington Post story portrayed an almost comically Nixonian executive suite, with the CEO (allegedly) countenancing a "sting" operation directed at a reporter.

This kind of thing requires a higher than ordinary degree of spin.

My suggestion is that the company follow the example of Salomon Brothers after its bond trading scandal in 1991. Replace the CEO or chairman with a godlike character like Warren Buffett, and then hire an ex-SEC chairman to conduct an "internal investigation" for a couple of dozen-million bucks.

Above all, stop the leaks! The WaPo story was based on a leak, and that is simply no good. Why not hire a detective and see who's behind it?

© 2006 Gary Weiss. All rights reserved.

-----------

Wall Street Versus America was published by Penguin USA on April 6.
Click here for its Amazon.com listing and here for more information on the book, from my web site.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

The Advantages of Paranoia

Years ago, while working on a sensitive story at Business Week, I actually hid my notes and other source materials so that they not be found by any intrusive cleaning women.

Afterwards I thought I was being a little silly, not to mention paranoid.

Not any more. The New York Times reported today that good old Hewlett-Packard (definitely not in the running for any "friend of the First Amendment" awards) was thinking of doing just that.

The company conducted feasibility studies that "are said to have included the possibility of placing investigators acting as clerical employees or cleaning crews in the San Francisco offices of CNET and The Wall Street Journal."

So I guess there is nothing wrong with a little paranoia after all.

Loathsome as Hewlett-Packard's conduct surely was, I'm having a little trouble trying to figure out if it broke any laws. I hope not. If corporate boorishness and stupidity were against the law, the penal system would break down under the strain, and we can't have that.

© 2006 Gary Weiss. All rights reserved.

-----------

Wall Street Versus America was published by Penguin USA on April 6.
Click here for its Amazon.com listing and here for more information on the book, from my web site.

Labels: