Are the Salt Lake City Papers Asleep?

Seth Jayson of the Motley Fool expresses bewilderment at the lack of media coverage of the departure of a key financial officer at the corporate crime petri dish, Overstock.com, coming as it did immediately after a devastating article in the Big Money.

He was focusing on the big wire services, and he's right, but what I wonder about is the bewildering (or maybe not so bewildering) silence of Overstock's hometown newspapers, the Salt Lake Tribune and the Deseret News. Not one word in those two newspapers about the departure of David Chidester, head of internal financial controls.

Are they too terrified of the Nastiest CEO in America, Patrick Byrne, to do their jobs? Are they worried about personal attacks by Byrne? Are they afraid of their families being terrorized by the child-stalker, Byrne's nauseating go-fer Judd Bagley?

They have good reason to be afraid. Bagley has engaged in pretexting and cyberstalking of the wives, kids and grandparents of media people. He has boasted about personally stalking my apartment in New York, and has targeted my wife in his Overstock-financed smear campaign. He tracked down the estranged wife of one Overstock critic, in unsuccessful effort to get dirt on that critic. He once targeted a teenage blogger. As author and financial blogger Barry Ritholtz correctly put it, he is a "career douche bag."

These newspapers' silence seems to substantiate one of the points in the Big Money article, which is that Byrne uses crude tactics to discourage coverage.

Said Roddy:

I am one of only two reporters—the other is my former Fortune magazine colleague Bethany McLean—apparently evil enough in his eyes to warrant a reference to oral sex and ejaculation in his assessment of our ethics and reporting skills.

. . . consider that investigating the likes of Overstock is to be propelled back into a parallel world of eighth-grade recess writ large, replete with smears, tricks, and dirty language. And just like eighth grade, Byrne has learned that many people simply don’t like to fight back.

Apparently these tactics work, and they certainly do close to home.

Keep in mind that Chidester's resignation is not a rumor. Overstock filed an SEC Form 8-K announcing his departure, five days after the event.

The resignation came one day after the Big Money story, citing internal company documents, pointed to Overstock engaging in a sales tax avoidance scheme and suffering from a total lack of internal financial controls. Blogger Sam Antar, a prime target of Overstock's hoods, perceptive blog post on the troubles facing David Chidester.

In his post today, Seth Jayson pointed out:

The guy [Chidester] who knows where the bodies are buried (or doesn't, which would be more interesting) at a firm that's under SEC investigation, the day after a story breaks about a tax-evasion scheme, and no one bothers to report on it?

That's what happens when clowns like Patty and Judd, the unacomplished Facebook Granny and Child stalker behave so insanely for so long. The media starts to ignore the simpler evidence of skankiness that's too boring and too obvious.

That, or as Roddy Boyd discussed in this article, the writers and editors out there are too afraid to risk the wrath of con.

The Salt Lake papers don't always ignore the loony activities of Overstock.com, with the Salt Lake Tribune (not the Deseret News) belatedly mentioning, after it was reported elsewhere, that the the company has fired its auditor, filed an unaudited financial statement, and engaged in a public row with the fired auditor.

But as far back as I can recall, neither paper has broken news about Overstock -- and no, occasional puff pieces and reprinted press releases and wire stories don't count as "breaking news."

The heavy lifting, and the exposure to attack, is left to out-of-town reporters like Joe Nocera of the New York Times, Carol Remond of Dow Jones, Bethany McLean, now with Vanity Fair, Herb Greenberg and Roddy Boyd, formerly of the New York Post and Fortune. All have been viciously attacked by Byrne and his employees.

With the Salt Lake papers shirking their responsibility, Utahns are left with out-of-town reporters like Roddy and bloggers like Sam Antar, who today described in detail how Overstock has violated accounting rules by failing to disclose related party transactions with its Deep Capture astroturf website. Byrne uses Deep Capture to intimidate his critics and the media. It is run by Byrne's employee Bagley, who has focused so obsessively on stalking kids that he is described by blogger Barry Ritholtz as a "possible pederast."

Just to put Barry's terminology in context:

. . . The reality turned out to be far more insidious than that: A career douche bag (and possible pedarast) named Judd Bagley decided to engage in some fraudulent pretexting. He assumed a false persona on Facebook, using someone else’s name and photo (perhaps committing a Felony in NYS). He then began cyber-stalking the children, friends and family of numerous journalists, bloggers and fund mangers. After friending all the kiddies, Bagley posted their names, friends, etc. at the Deep Capture site.

Sam describes in his blog how Overstock has systematically violated accounting standards that require disclosure of related party transactions. The transactions were with the Deep Capture site. Yep, that's the kind of company we're talking about. Yet not a word on any of this in the newspapers that purport to cover prim, proper Salt Lake City.

William Wolfrum, meanwhile, takes a satirical approach, as he did previously.

I don't expect the Salt Lake City papers to consider it news that a CEO in their midst is a laughingstock, reflecting on Utah companies generally, but an executive departure of such importance should not be ignored.

Once Overstock collapses under the weight of its own self-generated scandals, you can be sure of one thing: you won't be reading about it in Salt Lake City, unless Overstock issues a press release.

UPDATE: Talking Biz News asked both papers for reaction. Nada. Sam's work, meanwhile, received an enthusiastic endorsement from a leading academic authority on corporate accounting, Prof. David Albrecht: "As only Sam can, the Overstock.com fraud situation is dissected. Sliced and diced. This is a must read for any honest person who is curious about just how fraudsters go about their business."

© 2010 Gary Weiss. All rights reserved.

Suspicious Trading Ahead of Devastating Article on Overstock.com's Sales Tax Dodge

 

Somebody dumped big blocks of stock hours ahead of a negative article 

The Big Money this afternoon came out with a devastating (and gutsy) article by former Fortune writer Roddy Boyd on the corporate crime petri dish that is Overstock.com, and its nuts CEO Patrick Byrne. The title is "America's Nastiest CEO," and it describes how Byrne has systematically harassed and attacked critics to cover up his own incompetence and wrongdoing--stuff that actually is a lot worse than has previously been acknowledged. 

The article describes how Overstock was actually much more of a loony bin than any of its critics have contended over the years, with FUBAR internal controls and, above all, creation of a dodge for the purpose of escaping New York State sales taxes:

What caught the attention of critics was its announcement in the first quarter 10-Q filing in May of 2005 that it had set up a “variable interest entity” to engage in these transactions. The entity had agreed to lend Overstock up to $10 million—$8.4 million of which had been extended in November 2004—for which it received a below-market interest rate of 3.75 percent and a 50 percent claim to all profits. Overstock also had an option to buy the 50 percent it did not own.

Jeff Matthews, a hedge-fund manager, author, and blogger who had long been critical of Overstock and Byrne, immediately seized on the unusual structure of the transaction. He wondered why Byrne, who had discussed the great opportunities they were seeing (and participating in) within the diamond market that January, had not disclosed something as material as the joint venture.

. . . But the truth is much simpler: The deal seems to have been a tax dodge. The joint venture, struck with Moshe Krasnanski and his brother-in-law Mayer Gniwisch—a pair of veteran diamond merchants whom Byrne referred to as “Our Lubbavitcher friends”—had nothing to do with efforts to minimize accounting losses. In an e-mail to the board of directors, Byrne dubbed the process of recruiting the pair, who had set up the profitable online diamond-seller Ice.com, “Operation Heist and Freeze.” According to a memo, Overstock general counsel Jonathan Johnson prepared for the board of directors on July 13, 2005, the company’s VIE was designed to avoid a “nexus in the State of New York for sales tax purposes,” which means that the company would not have to collect, and pay out, sales taxes in the state. The diamond sales effort never really went anywhere for Overstock, and it was closed out during the holidays of 2006 with about $567,000 in accumulated losses, according to an internal balance sheet for the joint venture.

I imagine this explains why Gniwisch appeared on a message board to rub lotion after Byrne spouted some choice anti-Semitic epithets, as he does when life is not going well. 

 This is all horrific stuff, which brings me to the chart at the top of this item. Today, somebody dumped a 50,000-share block of this thinly traded company, and other large blocks were also jettisoned. The article appeared after the trading day ended. 

 I don't know if there's an insider trading issue, but I do know this--these trades may well have been prompted by Byrne revealing Roddy's impending article last Friday, in violation of Regulation FD, as in "fair disclosure." Today was the first trading day after the blog post appeared. 

He did so by a tactic he has used several times in the past, publishing Roddy's questions in a typically juvenile obscenity-laced blog post (below) aimed at attempting to sabotage the article. He has done this kind of thing before. He tried it with Roddy once before, and at about the same time scared BusinessWeek to not run an article under preparation in early 2006 on Overstock's woes. The Big Money was made of sterner stuff.

   

Not only did this abortive journalist-intimidation scheme backfire, but it put Byrne in violation of Reg. FD, by disclosing to a select audience the material fact that an incendiary, potentially market-moving story was about to come out. Regulation FD requires that investors receive material information from companies in a uniform, fair manner. 

Also last week, Overstock had to scramble to issue a form 8-K because of another FD violation, this one involving his blurting out to the New York Observer than the company was supposedly going to record a "profit" for last year. As I indicated at the time, Byrne simply does not like abiding by the securities laws. They're not included with his trust fund check, so as far as he's concerned they don't exist. 

The revelations in Roddy's article are all very serious stuff. New York state does not like schemes to avoid payment of state sales tax, particularly when the state is clutching after every penny. Carol Remond of Dow Jones News Service reported on Friday that the SEC has subpoenaed all discovery in the recent litigation involving Copper River partners (former Rocker Partners) and Overstock, which presumably includes all this sales-tax-dodging sleaze. 

All the king's horses and all the former SEC attorneys in his employ can't put the toothpaste back into this particular tube. It could mean the long-anticipated end to this dog's breakfast of a company and its stomach-turning chief executive officer. 

You have to admit, Overstock is dying as it has lived--right down in the sewer. But here's the ultimate irony: all the Ralph Kramden style schemes, all the tax avoidance and scumminess, haven't put a nickel in the pockets of Overstock's shareholders. 

 UPDATES: Barry Ritholtz inquires, "Is Patrick Byrne America’s Nastiest Dumbest CEO?":

Overstock has engaged in a variety of actions and inactions that are likely to subject it to various future civil, regulatory and tax proceedings in various courts. The heart of the article reflects a tax scam run by the firm to avoid paying New York State retail sales taxes. I would expect the New York and/or the SEC to use Boyd’s article as a road map for any prosecution. It is clear upon first reading this article that not only is this a disastrous retail operation, but it is run by a deeply disturbed individual who seems to have never tripped across “The Truth” even by accident.

. . . Here is a bit of irony: On paper, you might be led to think that Byrne is a bright guy — undergrad at Dartmouth, a Ph.D. in philosophy from Stanford, a Marshall scholar. It just goes to show you that having book smarts, being people savvy and possessing common sense can all be mutually exclusive.

I'm reminded of a famous quote from "Mr. Dooley," Finley Peter Dunne: "You can lead a man up to the university, but you can't make him think." 

There's a good deal more in Barry's blog, including an insightful review of the activities of the "possible pederast" Judd Bagley, Byrne's nauseating cyberstalker. Personally I think that description is unfair--to pederasts. 

Tim Sykes weighs in, though not specifically on the foregoing: "some people truly don't deserve free speech, spreading lies and misinformation about short selling Prick Byrne should be a penny stock promoter, not a public CEO." If and when stock reaches its true value, with the hot air and fraud removed, Byrne is going to be a penny stock promoter whether he likes it or not. 

Sam Antar blogs that the SEC is likely to expand its investigation into Sarbanes-Oxley violations:

. . . the article details that internal Overstock.com documents revealed that the company's "software system couldn’t track its inventory well, its accounting staff had trouble deciphering how much it owed and whom it had to pay."

However, my examination of Overstock.com's SEC filings finds that CEO Patrick Byrne and CFO David Chidester both signed Sarbanes-Oxley certifications for financial reports claiming that the company had effective internal controls over financial reporting, while internal company documents obtained by The Big Money contradict their representations to investors.

Sam has experience with the New York tax people from his days at the Crazy Eddie fraud:

Having done battle with New York's sales tax auditors as the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie, I learned the hard way that they are more tenacious than mob collectors in retrieving monies owed - no offense to the SEC, FBI, or IRS. Under New York law, company officers are not protected by the corporate veil and are personally liable for any sales tax deficiency.

That's right, and it's true with corporate tax issues generally. Once I worked for a small Washington news service that sometimes didn't pay withholding taxes to the D.C. government. The head of the news service spent a few days in jail, corporate shell notwithstanding.

Bagley, posting under a pseudonym, took exception to Barry calling him a "possible pederast," on the basis of Bagley's obsession with friending children on Facebook. Note the response: "Anyone who uses a false identity online and that starts friending children is definitely a fraud, factually a cyber-stalker, and possibly a pederast. Hence, 'possible pederast.'" 

Good point. His behavior speaks for itself. There is an old expression that begins, "if the shoe fits." And if Bagley would prefer not to be thought of as a possible pederast, why is he stalking children? 

© 2010 Gary Weiss. All rights reserved.